LinkedIn Engagement Surge: Women Discover Better Results By Pretending as Male Users
Are your LinkedIn followers viewing you as a thought leader? Do numerous commenters praising your advice on growing your venture? Do recruiters reaching out to explore opportunities?
If not, the reason might be your gender.
The Experiment: Modifying Gender Identity for Increased Reach
Numerous women participated in an organized professional network test this week after popular discussions indicated that changing their profile gender to "man" enhanced their network presence.
Other testers rewrote their profiles to incorporate what they termed "bro-coded" language - inserting action-focused professional jargon like "propel", "transform" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their visibility similarly increased.
Algorithmic Bias Concerns Brought Up
The engagement increase has caused some to wonder whether an inherent sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes male users who employ professional networking terminology.
Similar to many large social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to determine which posts appear to which users - boosting some while reducing others.
Platform Response
Through a company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but claimed it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when deciding post visibility. Instead, the company explained that "numerous factors" affect how content perform.
Changing gender in your settings does not affect how your content appears in results or timelines.
Individual Results
A social media consultant, who modified her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her name to "a masculine version", described remarkable outcomes.
"The numbers I'm seeing show a 1,600% increase in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she commented.
Another professional, a communications strategist, started testing after noticing her reach decrease significantly.
The Method
- First, she modified her gender to "man"
- Subsequently, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her profile using "masculine-oriented" language
- Lastly, she recycled old posts with comparable "assertive" language
The outcome was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in reach within seven days.
The Downside
Although the success, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the method.
"Before, my posts were softer - brief and insightful, but also warm and relatable," she stated. "Currently, the bro-coded version was assertive and confident - like a white male being overly confident."
She discontinued the experiment after seven days, saying "Every day I persisted, and outcomes got better, I became angrier."
Mixed Results
Not all participants experienced favorable outcomes. One writer who modified both her gender to "man" and her race to "white" reported a decrease in reach and interaction.
"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it functions in particular situations or why," she remarked.
Broader Implications
These experiments occur alongside ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a business platform and community site.
Platform modifications in recent months have reportedly resulted in female creators experiencing significantly reduced visibility, leading to unofficial tests where identical content by men and women received dramatically unequal reach.
Technical Explanation
According to LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to classify and distribute posts based on multiple factors, including post content and the member's career profile.
The company claims it frequently assesses its systems, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."
Company representative suggested that current reductions in some users' reach might originate from higher volume due to more content on the platform.
Evolving Environment
According to a tester observed, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the platform.
"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she remarked. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and less controlled."