What Exactly Has Gone Awry at Zipcar – Is the UK Car-Sharing Sector Dead?

A community kitchen in Rotherhithe has been delivering hundreds of prepared dishes each week for two years to elderly residents and vulnerable locals in southeast London. However, the group's plans face major disruption by the announcement that they will not have use of New Year’s Day.

This organization depended on Zipcar, the app-based vehicle rental service that customers to access its fleet of vehicles via smartphone. The company sent shockwaves through the capital when it said it would shut down its UK operations from 1 January.

It will mean many volunteers cannot collect food from the Felix Project, that collects excess produce from supermarkets, cafes and restaurants. Other options are further away, costlier, or do not offer the same convenient access.

“The impact will be massively,” stated Vimal Pandya, the project's founder. “Personally me and my team are concerned by the logistical challenge we will face. A lot of people like ours are going to struggle.”

“Knowing the reality, they are all worried and thinking: ‘How will we continue?’”

A Significant Setback for Urban Car-Sharing

The community kitchen’s drivers are part of over 500,000 people in London who were car club members, who could be left without convenient access to vehicles, avoiding the burden and cost of ownership. The vast majority of those people were likely with Zipcar, which held a dominant position in the city.

The planned closure, pending consultation with employees, is a big blow to the vision that vehicle clubs in cities could reduce the need for private vehicle ownership. Yet, some analysts also suggested that Zipcar’s exit need not mean the demise for the concept in Britain.

The Promise of Car Sharing

Car sharing is valued by city planners and environmentalists as a way of reducing the ills associated with vehicle ownership. Most cars sit idle on the side of the road for 95% of the time, using up space. They also require large carbon emissions to produce, and people who do not own cars tend to walk, cycle and take transit more. That helps urban areas – reducing congestion and pollution – and boosts public health through more exercise.

What Went Wrong?

Zipcar was founded in 2000 before being bought by the American rental giant Avis Budget in 2013. Zipcar’s UK revenues were minimal compared with its parent company's overall annual revenue, and a loss that grew to £11.7m in 2024 gave no reason to continue.

Avis Budget has said the closure is part of a “wider restructuring across our global operations, where we are taking deliberate steps to streamline operations, improve returns”.

Zipcar’s most recent accounts noted revenues had declined as drivers took fewer and shorter trips. “These changes reflect the ongoing impact of the economic squeeze, which continues to suppress demand for discretionary spending,” it said.

London's Unique Hurdles

However, industry observers noted that London has particular issues that made it much harder for the sector to succeed.

  • Inconsistent Rules: Across 33 boroughs, car-club operators face a mosaic of different procedures and prices that made it harder.
  • New Costs: The closure coincides with electric cars start paying London’s congestion charge, adding extra expenses.
  • Unequal Parking Fees: Residents in some boroughs pay as little as £63 for a year’s electric car parking permit. A similar shared vehicle would pay over £1,100 per year, creating a significant barrier.

“Our fees should be one-twentieth of a resident’s permit,” said Robert Schopen of Co Wheels. “We remove vehicles. We’re putting less polluting cars in their place.”

A European Example

Nations in Europe offer examples for London to follow. Germany introduced national shared mobility laws in 2017, providing a unified system for parking, subsidies and exemptions. Now, the country has 5.4 shared cars per 10,000 people, while France has 2.1 and Belgium has 6.3. The UK trails at 0.7.

“The evidence shows is that car sharing around the world, especially in Europe, is expanding,” said Bharath Devanathan of Invers.

Devanathan said authorities should start to view vehicle clubs as a form of mass transit, and link it with train and bus stations. He added that one unnamed client was looking at entering the London market: “There will be fill this gap.”

The Future Landscape

Other players can be split into two camps:

  1. Company-Owned Fleets: Which own or lease their own cars. This includes Denmark’s GreenMobility, France’s Free2Move, and Germany’s Miles Mobility.
  2. Peer-to-Peer Services: Which allow users to hire out their own vehicles via an app – a kind of Airbnb for cars. Players include Britain’s Hiyacar and the US’s Getaround and Turo.

One company, a US-headquartered P2P service, is assessing the UK gap. Rory Brimmer, its UK head, said there was a “big opportunity” to win more users. “A space exists that is going to need to be filled, because London still needs to move,” Brimmer said.

Yet, it could take some time for other players to build momentum. In the meantime, more people may feel forced to buy cars, and many across London will be left without access.

For Rotherhithe community kitchen, the next month will be a rush to find a way. The delivery problem caused by Zipcar’s exit underscores the broader impact of its departure on community groups and the prospects of shared mobility in the UK.

Gary Carlson
Gary Carlson

A seasoned esports analyst and former pro gamer, sharing strategies to help players improve their skills.

Popular Post